Accessibility statement.

About this statement

This site isn't legally bound by RGAA accessibility requirements (which apply to public sector bodies), but its owner applies that approach out of professional conviction. This statement honestly describes the site's accessibility: what was checked, what wasn't, and known non-conformities.

Methodology

This assessment relies on automated testing tools (Lighthouse/axe-core) run against the site's main pages, complemented by a manual code review. It is not a full RGAA audit conducted under the official methodology (page sample, 106 criteria, accredited tester) - automated tools only cover part of the RGAA/WCAG criteria, and most manual checks (keyboard navigation, screen readers) still need deeper testing.

Automated test results

• Home: 96/100
• CV, Projects, Blog, Legal notice: 100/100
• Color contrast: passes everywhere except the homepage (see known non-conformities below)
• HTML structure, ARIA attributes, page language, viewport: pass

Live score (homepage, updated daily, click for the full report):

Known non-conformities

• On the homepage, some decorative elements of the "code editor" panels (indent dots, punctuation, line numbers) are deliberately dimmed below the WCAG AA contrast threshold (4.5:1), to preserve the dimmed source-code look - an intentional design choice, not an oversight.
• Some tech-stack badge colors, matched to real brand colors (GitHub, OpenAI...), fall under that same threshold to stay faithful to those tools' visual identity.

Report an issue

If any part of the site is inaccessible to you, please report it to maximejolivet.pro@gmail.com - this feedback will be taken into account.